International Monetary Fund Administrative Tribunal Reports, Volume II, 2000-2002.

This paper discusses that during 2000-2002, the Tribunal considered a number of issues of substantive law upon which it had not previously been called upon to rule. These included interpretation of a provision of the IMF's Staff Retirement Plan that permits the IMF, pursuant to specified proced...

Deskribapen osoa

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Erakunde egilea: International Monetary Fund
Formatua: Aldizkaria
Hizkuntza:English
Argitaratua: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2009.
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02237cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF022889
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 15.00 USD 
020 |z 9781589067998 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
110 2 |a International Monetary Fund. 
245 1 0 |a International Monetary Fund Administrative Tribunal Reports, Volume II, 2000-2002. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2009. 
300 |a 1 online resource (336 pages) 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a This paper discusses that during 2000-2002, the Tribunal considered a number of issues of substantive law upon which it had not previously been called upon to rule. These included interpretation of a provision of the IMF's Staff Retirement Plan that permits the IMF, pursuant to specified procedures, to give effect to orders for family support and division of marital property issued by domestic courts. Having the benefit of the extensive pleadings of all three parties, the Tribunal rendered a decision resolving the merits of the dispute. The Tribunal considered the evidence offered by the IMF in support of the differential in benefits between the two categories of staff and concluded that the distinction was rationally related to the purposes of the employment benefits at issue. Tribunal also grappled during 2000-2002 with the complexities of its relationship to other elements of the IMF's dispute resolution system. The IMFAT addressed the question of the admissibility before the Tribunal of an Application following dismissal of the complaint as untimely by the IMF's Grievance Committee. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
650 7 |a Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Private Pensions  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Retirement Policies  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Retirement  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue  |2 imf 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u https://elibrary.imf.org/openurl?genre=book&isbn=9781589067998  |z IMF e-Library