Has Chinese Aid Benefited Recipient Countries? : Evidence from a Meta-Regression Analysis /

This paper employs a meta-regression analysis of 473 estimates from 15 studies to take stock of the empirical literature on Chinese aid effectiveness. After accommodating publication selection bias, we find that, on average, Beijing's foreign assistance has had a positive impact on economic and...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Mandon, Pierre
Autres auteurs: Tesfaye Woldemichael, Martha
Format: Revue
Langue:English
Publié: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2022.
Collection:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2022/046
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02367cas a2200325 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF022490
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9798400200670 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Mandon, Pierre. 
245 1 0 |a Has Chinese Aid Benefited Recipient Countries? :   |b Evidence from a Meta-Regression Analysis /  |c Pierre Mandon, Martha Tesfaye Woldemichael. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2022. 
300 |a 1 online resource (39 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a This paper employs a meta-regression analysis of 473 estimates from 15 studies to take stock of the empirical literature on Chinese aid effectiveness. After accommodating publication selection bias, we find that, on average, Beijing's foreign assistance has had a positive impact on economic and social outcomes in recipient countries but an opposite effect on governance, albeit negligible in size. We also show that (i) studies that fail to uncover statistically significant effects are less likely to be submitted to journals, or accepted for publication; and (ii) results are not driven by authors' institutional affiliation. Differences in study characteristics such as the type of development outcome considered, how the Chinese aid variable is measured, the geographic region under study, and publication outlet explain the heterogeneity among Chinese aid effectiveness estimates reported in the literature. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
650 7 |a Econometric and Statistical Methods  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Economic Development and Innovation  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Foreign Aid and Meta-Regression Analysis  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Foreign Aid  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Publication Selection Bias  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Technological Change and Growth  |2 imf 
700 1 |a Tesfaye Woldemichael, Martha. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2022/046 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2022/046/001.2022.issue-046-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library