Uncertainty Premia, Sovereign Default Risk, and State-Contingent Debt /

We analyze how concerns for model misspecification on the part of international lenders affect the desirability of issuing state-contingent debt instruments in a standard sovereign default model a la Eaton and Gersovitz (1981). We show that for the commonly used threshold state-contingent bond struc...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Opis bibliograficzny
1. autor: Roch, Francisco
Kolejni autorzy: Roldan, Francisco
Format: Czasopismo
Język:English
Wydane: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2021.
Seria:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2021/076
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02225cas a2200313 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF021584
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781513572635 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Roch, Francisco. 
245 1 0 |a Uncertainty Premia, Sovereign Default Risk, and State-Contingent Debt /  |c Francisco Roch, Francisco Roldan. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2021. 
300 |a 1 online resource (38 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We analyze how concerns for model misspecification on the part of international lenders affect the desirability of issuing state-contingent debt instruments in a standard sovereign default model a la Eaton and Gersovitz (1981). We show that for the commonly used threshold state-contingent bond structure (e.g., the GDP-linked bond issued by Argentina in 2005), the model with robustness generates ambiguity premia in bond spreads that can explain most of what the literature has labeled as novelty premium. While the government would be better off with this bond when facing rational expectations lenders, this additional source of premia leads to welfare losses when facing robust lenders. Finally, we characterize the optimal design of the state-contingent bond and show how it varies with the level of robustness. Our findings rationalize the little use of these instruments in practice and shed light on their optimal design. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
650 7 |a Ambiguity Premia  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Default  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Robust Control  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Sovereign Debt  |2 imf 
650 7 |a State-Contingent Debt Instruments  |2 imf 
700 1 |a Roldan, Francisco. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2021/076 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2021/076/001.2021.issue-076-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library