Fifteenth General Review of Quotas-Further Considerations.

The paper revisits the two-pillar framework for assessing the adequacy of Fund resources. Responding to Directors suggestions, the quantitative pillar is updated to include alternative assumptions and to provide a longer-term perspective on likely resource needs. While quantitative estimates are gen...

Ամբողջական նկարագրություն

Մատենագիտական մանրամասներ
Համատեղ հեղինակ: International Monetary Fund. Finance Dept
Ձևաչափ: Ամսագիր
Լեզու:English
Հրապարակվել է: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2021.
Շարք:Policy Papers; Policy Paper ; No. 2021/009
Խորագրեր:
Առցանց հասանելիություն:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02356cas a2200253 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF021572
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781513571287 
022 |a 2663-3493 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
110 2 |a International Monetary Fund.  |b Finance Dept. 
245 1 0 |a Fifteenth General Review of Quotas-Further Considerations. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2021. 
300 |a 1 online resource (93 pages) 
490 1 |a Policy Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a The paper revisits the two-pillar framework for assessing the adequacy of Fund resources. Responding to Directors suggestions, the quantitative pillar is updated to include alternative assumptions and to provide a longer-term perspective on likely resource needs. While quantitative estimates are generally somewhat lower after factoring in the alternative assumptions, these reductions are more than outweighed when the analysis is extended through the middle of the next decade, recognizing that the outcome of the 15th Review will likely determine permanent Fund resources through at least the middle of the next decade. The updated qualitative pillar analysis highlights reforms since the global financial crisis and discusses uncertainties in the global environment. It also provides an assessment of the general impact of the various qualitative considerations. Taken together, the two pillars continue to make a case for at least maintaining existing Fund resources. Against this background, the simulations in the paper cover three illustrative sizes for quota increases (50, 75, and 100 percent), centered on broadly maintaining Fund resources, assuming the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) is maintained at its current level and Bilateral Borrowing Agreements (BBAs) expire. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
650 7 |a Financial Crises  |2 imf 
830 0 |a Policy Papers; Policy Paper ;  |v No. 2021/009 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/007/2021/009/007.2021.issue-009-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library