Trade, Productivity and (Mis)allocation /

We examine the gains from globalization in the presence of firm heterogeneity and potential resource misallocation. We show theoretically that without distortions, bilateral and export liberalizations increase aggregate welfare and productivity, while import liberalization has ambiguous effects. Res...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Berthou, Antoine
Altri autori: Chung, John Jong-Hyun, Manova, Kalina, Sandoz, Charlotte
Natura: Periodico
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2020.
Serie:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2020/163
Accesso online:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02420cas a2200277 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF021198
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781513554440 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Berthou, Antoine. 
245 1 0 |a Trade, Productivity and (Mis)allocation /  |c Antoine Berthou, John Jong-Hyun Chung, Kalina Manova, Charlotte Sandoz. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2020. 
300 |a 1 online resource (77 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We examine the gains from globalization in the presence of firm heterogeneity and potential resource misallocation. We show theoretically that without distortions, bilateral and export liberalizations increase aggregate welfare and productivity, while import liberalization has ambiguous effects. Resource misallocation can either amplify, dampen or reverse the gains from trade. Using model-consistent measures and unique new data on 14 European countries and 20 industries in 1998-2011, we empirically establish that exogenous shocks to export demand and import competition both generate large aggregate productivity gains. Guided by theory, we provide evidence consistent with these effects operating through reallocations across firms in the presence of distortions: (i) Both export and import expansion increase average firm productivity, but the former also shifts activity towards more productive firms, while the latter acts in reverse; (ii) Both export and import exposure raise the productivity threshold for survival, but this cut-off is not a sufficient statistic for aggregate productivity; (iii) Efficient institutions, factor and product markets amplify the gains from import competition but dampen those from export access. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Chung, John Jong-Hyun. 
700 1 |a Manova, Kalina. 
700 1 |a Sandoz, Charlotte. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2020/163 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2020/163/001.2020.issue-163-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library