Debt, Investment, and Growth in Developing Countries with Segmented Labor Markets /

We introduce a new suite of macroeconomic models that extend and complement the Debt, Investment, and Growth (DIG) model widely used at the IMF since 2012. The new DIG-Labor models feature segmented labor markets, efficiency wages and open unemployment, and an informal non-agricultural sector. These...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Hovedforfatter: Buffie, Edward
Andre forfattere: Adam, Christopher, Balma, Lacina, Zanna, Luis-Felipe
Format: Tidsskrift
Sprog:English
Udgivet: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2020.
Serier:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2020/102
Online adgang:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02667cas a2200277 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF020991
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781513545639 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Buffie, Edward. 
245 1 0 |a Debt, Investment, and Growth in Developing Countries with Segmented Labor Markets /  |c Edward Buffie, Luis-Felipe Zanna, Christopher Adam, Lacina Balma. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2020. 
300 |a 1 online resource (95 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We introduce a new suite of macroeconomic models that extend and complement the Debt, Investment, and Growth (DIG) model widely used at the IMF since 2012. The new DIG-Labor models feature segmented labor markets, efficiency wages and open unemployment, and an informal non-agricultural sector. These features allow for a deeper examination of macroeconomic and fiscal policy programs and their impact on labor market outcomes, inequality, and poverty. The paper illustrates the model's properties by analyzing the growth, debt, and distributional consequences of big-push public investment programs with different mixes of investment in human capital and infrastructure. We show that investment in human capital is much more effective than investment in infrastructure in promoting long-run economic development when investments earn their average estimated returns. The decision about how much to invest in human capital versus infrastructure involves, however, an acute intertemporal trade-off. Because investment in education affects labor productivity with a long lag, it takes 15+ years before net national income, the private capital stock, real wages for the poor, and formal sector employment surpass their counterparts in a program that invests mainly in infrastructure. The ranking of alternative investment programs depends on the policymakers' social discount rate and on the weight of distributional objectives in the social welfare function. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Adam, Christopher. 
700 1 |a Balma, Lacina. 
700 1 |a Zanna, Luis-Felipe. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2020/102 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2020/102/001.2020.issue-102-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library