External Evaluation of the Independent Evaluation Office.

We have been asked by the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund to undertake an external review of the activities of its Independent Evaluation Office (IEO). This is the second such evaluation in the IEO's twelve year history. The first review, led by Karin Lissakers (the 'Lis...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Müşterek Yazar: International Monetary Fund
Materyal Türü: Dergi
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2013.
Seri Bilgileri:Policy Papers; Policy Paper ; No. 2013/069
Online Erişim:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02294cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF020382
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781498342353 
022 |a 2663-3493 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
110 2 |a International Monetary Fund. 
245 1 0 |a External Evaluation of the Independent Evaluation Office. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2013. 
300 |a 1 online resource (86 pages) 
490 1 |a Policy Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We have been asked by the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund to undertake an external review of the activities of its Independent Evaluation Office (IEO). This is the second such evaluation in the IEO's twelve year history. The first review, led by Karin Lissakers (the 'Lissakers Report'), was presented to the Board in 2006. That report considered the extent to which the Office had succeeded during its first five years of operation in fulfilling its mandates and made recommendations to enhance its role within the IMF's institutional architecture. Our report thus focuses on IEO activities since 2006. As set out in the terms of reference of our Panel (see Appendix I), the central objective of this report is to evaluate how well the IEO has met its institutional mandates. The terms of reference, while not constraining the range of issues we could consider, also asks that we 'assess the IEO's effectiveness along several dimensions, including: (i) the appropriateness of evaluation topics; (ii) the independence of the IEO; (iii) the cost-effectiveness of the IEO and its operations; and (iv) the appropriateness and adequacy of the evaluation process including, but not limited to, how IEO recommendations are endorsed by the Board and implemented.'. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a Policy Papers; Policy Paper ;  |v No. 2013/069 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/007/2013/069/007.2013.issue-069-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library