Borrowing Agreement with the Bank of Finland.

This paper is one in a series of follow-up papers on The Fund's Mandate-An Overview and The Fund's Mandate-The Legal Framework discussed by the Executive Board on February 22, 2010. This paper proposes ideas to modernize the mandate and modalities of surveillance. It addresses how the Fund...

Deskribapen osoa

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Erakunde egilea: International Monetary Fund
Formatua: Aldizkaria
Hizkuntza:English
Argitaratua: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2010.
Saila:Policy Papers; Policy Paper ; No. 2010/020
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02527cas a2200313 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF020317
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781498337731 
022 |a 2663-3493 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
110 2 |a International Monetary Fund. 
245 1 0 |a Borrowing Agreement with the Bank of Finland. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2010. 
300 |a 1 online resource (7 pages) 
490 1 |a Policy Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a This paper is one in a series of follow-up papers on The Fund's Mandate-An Overview and The Fund's Mandate-The Legal Framework discussed by the Executive Board on February 22, 2010. This paper proposes ideas to modernize the mandate and modalities of surveillance. It addresses how the Fund might increase the value of its surveillance by considering both the substance of surveillance (what it should do) and its modalities (how to do it). The main ideas focus on how the Fund can do more-and more sharply defined-multilateral surveillance, generate greater value and traction from bilateral surveillance, and integrate the two better. Options to buttress multilateral surveillance include doing more analysis of outward spillovers, holding multilateral consultations as needed on special topics to foster collaboration and collective action, and strengthening financial sector surveillance by mapping interconnectedness across borders and sectors and the transmission channels of macro-financial instability. The adoption of Multilateral Surveillance Decision could help support these ideas. Options to increase the value and traction of bilateral surveillance include promoting better cross-country understanding, with more thematic multi-country reports, producing more timely and topical reports, and increasing outreach and engagement with stakeholders. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
650 7 |a Agreement  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Amount  |2 imf 
650 7 |a Fund  |2 imf 
650 7 |a PP  |2 imf 
650 7 |a SDR  |2 imf 
651 7 |a Finland  |2 imf 
830 0 |a Policy Papers; Policy Paper ;  |v No. 2010/020 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/007/2010/020/007.2010.issue-020-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library