Policy Trade-Offs in Building Resilience to Natural Disasters : The Case of St. Lucia /

Resilience to climate change and natural disasters hinges on two fundamental elements: financial protection -insurance and self-insurance- and structural protection -investment in adaptation. Using a dynamic general equilibrium model calibrated to the St. Lucia's economy, this paper shows that...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autor: Cantelmo, Alessandro
Další autoři: Bonato, Leo, Melina, Giovanni, Salinas, Gonzalo
Médium: Časopis
Jazyk:English
Vydáno: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2019.
Edice:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2019/054
On-line přístup:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02025cas a2200277 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF019124
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781498302654 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Cantelmo, Alessandro. 
245 1 0 |a Policy Trade-Offs in Building Resilience to Natural Disasters :   |b The Case of St. Lucia /  |c Alessandro Cantelmo, Leo Bonato, Giovanni Melina, Gonzalo Salinas. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2019. 
300 |a 1 online resource (18 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a Resilience to climate change and natural disasters hinges on two fundamental elements: financial protection -insurance and self-insurance- and structural protection -investment in adaptation. Using a dynamic general equilibrium model calibrated to the St. Lucia's economy, this paper shows that both strategies considerably reduce the output loss from natural disasters and studies the conditions under which each of the two strategies provides the best protection. While structural protection normally delivers a larger payoff because of its direct dampening effect on the cost of disasters, financial protection is superior when liquidity constraints limit the ability of the government to rebuild public capital promptly. The estimated trade-off is very sensitive to the efficiency of public investment. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Bonato, Leo. 
700 1 |a Melina, Giovanni. 
700 1 |a Salinas, Gonzalo. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2019/054 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2019/054/001.2019.issue-054-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library