Employment Protection Deregulation and Labor Shares in Advanced Economies /

Labor market deregulation, intended to boost productivity and employment, is one plausible, yet little studied, driver of the decline in labor shares that took place across most advanced economies since the early 1990s. This paper assesses the impact of job protection deregulation in a sample of 26...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ciminelli, Gabriele
Otros Autores: Duval, Romain, Furceri, Davide
Formato: Revista
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2018.
Colección:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2018/186
Acceso en línea:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02699cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF018645
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781484370087 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Ciminelli, Gabriele. 
245 1 0 |a Employment Protection Deregulation and Labor Shares in Advanced Economies /  |c Gabriele Ciminelli, Romain Duval, Davide Furceri. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2018. 
300 |a 1 online resource (72 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a Labor market deregulation, intended to boost productivity and employment, is one plausible, yet little studied, driver of the decline in labor shares that took place across most advanced economies since the early 1990s. This paper assesses the impact of job protection deregulation in a sample of 26 advanced economies over the period 1970-2015, using a newly constructed dataset of major reforms to employment protection legislation for regular contracts. We apply the local projection method to estimate the dynamic response of the labor share to our reform events at both the country and the country-industry levels. For the latter, we employ a differences-in-differences identification strategy using two identifying assumptions grounded in theory-namely that job protection deregulation should have larger negative effects in industries characterized by (i) a higher 'natural' propensity to adjust the workforce, and (ii) a lower elasticity of substitution between capital and labor. We find a statistically significant, economically large and robust negative effect of deregulation on the labor share. In particular, illustrative back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that job protection deregulation may have contributed about 15 percent to the average labor share decline in advanced economies. Together with existing evidence regarding the macroeconomic gains from job protection and other labor market reforms, our results also point to the need for policymakers to address efficiency-equity trade-offs when designing such reforms. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Duval, Romain. 
700 1 |a Furceri, Davide. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2018/186 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2018/186/001.2018.issue-186-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library