The Political Economy of Fiscal Transparency and Independent Fiscal Councils /

The global surge in independent fiscal councils (IFCs) raises three related questions: How can IFCs improve the conduct of fiscal policy? Are they simultaneously desirable for voters and elected policymakers? And are they resilient to changes in political conditions? We build a model in which voters...

Full beskrivning

Bibliografiska uppgifter
Huvudupphovsman: Beetsma, Roel
Övriga upphovsmän: Debrun, Xavier, Sloof, Randolph
Materialtyp: Tidskrift
Språk:English
Publicerad: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2017.
Serie:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2017/195
Länkar:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02469cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF017857
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781484315552 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Beetsma, Roel. 
245 1 4 |a The Political Economy of Fiscal Transparency and Independent Fiscal Councils /  |c Roel Beetsma, Xavier Debrun, Randolph Sloof. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2017. 
300 |a 1 online resource (48 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a The global surge in independent fiscal councils (IFCs) raises three related questions: How can IFCs improve the conduct of fiscal policy? Are they simultaneously desirable for voters and elected policymakers? And are they resilient to changes in political conditions? We build a model in which voters cannot observe the true competence of elected policymakers. IFCs' role is to mitigate this imperfection. Equilibrium public debt is excessive because policymakers are 'partisan' and 'opportunistic.' If voters only care about policymakers' competence, both the incumbent and the voters would be better off with an IFC as the debt bias would shrink. However, when other considerations eclipse competence and give the incumbent a strong electoral advantage or disadvantage, setting up an IFC may be counterproductive as the debt bias would increase. If the incumbent holds a moderate electoral advantage or disadvantage, voters would prefer an IFC, but an incumbent with a large advantage may prefer not to have an IFC. The main policy implications are that (i) establishing an IFC can only lower the debt bias if voters care sufficiently about policymakers' competence; (ii) not all political environments are conducive to the emergence of IFCs; and (iii) IFCs are consequently vulnerable to shifts in political conditions. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Debrun, Xavier. 
700 1 |a Sloof, Randolph. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2017/195 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2017/195/001.2017.issue-195-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library