Long-term Gain, Short-Term Pain : Assessing the Potential Impact of Structural Reforms in Chile /

In this paper, I study the potential economic impact of the 2015-18 structural reform agenda in Chile, using the IMF dynamic general equilibrium model (GIMF). I find that the agenda has the potential to significantly increase Chile's long-run GDP, although it may have some negative effects in t...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Santoro, Marika
বিন্যাস: পত্রিকা
ভাষা:English
প্রকাশিত: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2015.
মালা:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2015/282
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 01804cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF016488
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781513537634 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Santoro, Marika. 
245 1 0 |a Long-term Gain, Short-Term Pain :   |b Assessing the Potential Impact of Structural Reforms in Chile /  |c Marika Santoro. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2015. 
300 |a 1 online resource (35 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a In this paper, I study the potential economic impact of the 2015-18 structural reform agenda in Chile, using the IMF dynamic general equilibrium model (GIMF). I find that the agenda has the potential to significantly increase Chile's long-run GDP, although it may have some negative effects in the short term. Ensuring a smooth transition to a higher productive potential depends on three key dimensions: the credibility of the reforms, their effectiveness in closing structural gaps, and their speed of implementation. Badly designed reforms that remove only a very small fraction of the existing structural gaps, at a slow speed, and with little credibility, can greatly reduce the positive impact of the reform agenda on GDP. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2015/282 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/282/001.2015.issue-282-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library