|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02003cas a2200253 a 4500 |
001 |
AALejournalIMF015322 |
008 |
230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d |
020 |
|
|
|c 5.00 USD
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781513597584
|
022 |
|
|
|a 1018-5941
|
040 |
|
|
|a BD-DhAAL
|c BD-DhAAL
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Law, Daniel.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Assessing Default Risks for Chinese Firms :
|b A Lost Cause? /
|c Daniel Law, Shaun Roache.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c 2015.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (32 pages)
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
500 |
|
|
|a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
500 |
|
|
|a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
506 |
|
|
|a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Assessing default risks for Chinese firms is hard. Standard measures of risk using market indicators may be unreliable because of implicit guarantees, the large role played by less-informed investors, and other market imperfections. We test this assertion by estimating stand-alone 1-year default probabilities for non-financial firms in China using an equity-based structural model and debt costs. We find evidence that the equity measure of default risk is sensitive to a firm's balance sheet health, profitability, and ownership; specifically, default probabilities are higher for weaker, less profitable, and state-owned firms. In contrast, measures based on the cost of debt seem largely detached from fundamentals and instead determined by implicit guarantees. We conclude that for individual firms, equity-based measures, while far from perfect, provide a better measure of stand-alone default risks than borrowing costs.
|
538 |
|
|
|a Mode of access: Internet
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Roache, Shaun.
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
|v No. 2015/140
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Full text available on IMF
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/140/001.2015.issue-140-en.xml
|z IMF e-Library
|