When Should Public Debt Be Reduced? /

What considerations should guide public debt policy going forward? Should debt be reduced to achieve normative anchors (such as 60 percent of GDP), should it be increased further to finance a big public investment push, or should the existing debt be serviced forever? We argue that, for countries wi...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Ostry, Jonathan
অন্যান্য লেখক: Espinoza, Raphael, Ghosh, Atish
বিন্যাস: পত্রিকা
ভাষা:English
প্রকাশিত: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2015.
মালা:Staff Discussion Notes; Staff Discussion Notes ; No. 2015/010
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02036cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF015236
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781498379205 
022 |a 2617-6750 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Ostry, Jonathan. 
245 1 0 |a When Should Public Debt Be Reduced? /  |c Jonathan Ostry, Atish Ghosh, Raphael Espinoza. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2015. 
300 |a 1 online resource (26 pages) 
490 1 |a Staff Discussion Notes 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a What considerations should guide public debt policy going forward? Should debt be reduced to achieve normative anchors (such as 60 percent of GDP), should it be increased further to finance a big public investment push, or should the existing debt be serviced forever? We argue that, for countries with ample fiscal space (little risk of encountering a fiscal crisis), raising distortive taxes merely to bring the debt down is a treatment cure that is worse than the disease. High public debt of course is costly, but it is a sunk cost only made worse by efforts to pay down the debt through distortionary taxation. Living with the debt is the welfare-maximizing policy. In decisions vis-a-vis the big push for public investment, golden-rule considerations remain salient, with due account taken of the additional servicing costs (and associated distortive taxation) from the resulting buildup of public debt. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Espinoza, Raphael. 
700 1 |a Ghosh, Atish. 
830 0 |a Staff Discussion Notes; Staff Discussion Notes ;  |v No. 2015/010 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/006/2015/010/006.2015.issue-010-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library