|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01755cas a2200253 a 4500 |
| 001 |
AALejournalIMF011332 |
| 008 |
230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|c 5.00 USD
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9781463922009
|
| 022 |
|
|
|a 1018-5941
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a BD-DhAAL
|c BD-DhAAL
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Minoiu, Camelia.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Global Poverty Estimates :
|b A Sensitivity Analysis /
|c Camelia Minoiu, Shatakshee Dhongde.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c 2011.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (30 pages)
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
| 506 |
|
|
|a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a Current estimates of global poverty vary substantially across studies. In this paper we undertake a novel sensitivity analysis to highlight the importance of methodological choices in estimating global poverty. We measure global poverty using different data sources, parametric and nonparametric estimation methods, and multiple poverty lines. Our results indicate that estimates of global poverty vary significantly when they are based alternately on data from household surveys versus national accounts but are relatively consistent across different estimation methods. The decline in poverty over the past decade is found to be robust across methodological choices.
|
| 538 |
|
|
|a Mode of access: Internet
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Dhongde, Shatakshee.
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
|v No. 2011/234
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Full text available on IMF
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2011/234/001.2011.issue-234-en.xml
|z IMF e-Library
|