Empirical Evidence on the New International Aid Architecture /

We study how 22 donors allocate their bilateral aid among 147 recipient countries over the 1970- 2004 period to investigate whether changes in the international aid architecture?at the international and country level?have led to changes in behavior. We find that after the fall of the Berlin wall, an...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Cassimon, Danny
Altri autori: Campenhout, Bjorn Van, Claessens, Stijn
Natura: Periodico
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2007.
Serie:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2007/277
Accesso online:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02258cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF009682
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451868401 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Cassimon, Danny. 
245 1 0 |a Empirical Evidence on the New International Aid Architecture /  |c Danny Cassimon, Stijn Claessens, Bjorn Van Campenhout. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2007. 
300 |a 1 online resource (53 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We study how 22 donors allocate their bilateral aid among 147 recipient countries over the 1970- 2004 period to investigate whether changes in the international aid architecture?at the international and country level?have led to changes in behavior. We find that after the fall of the Berlin wall, and especially in the late nineties, bilateral aid responds more to economic need and the quality of a recipient country's policy and institutional environment and less to debt, size, and colonial linkages. Importantly, we find that when a country uses a PRSP and passes the HIPC decision point the perverse effect of large bilateral and multilateral debt shares on aid flows is reduced, suggesting less defensive lending. Overall, it appears international aid architecture changes have led to more selectivity in aid allocations. The specific factors causing these changes remain unclear, however. Furthermore, there remain large differences among donors in selectivity that appear to relate to donors' own institutional environments. Together this suggests that further reforms will have to be multifaceted. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Campenhout, Bjorn Van. 
700 1 |a Claessens, Stijn. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2007/277 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2007/277/001.2007.issue-277-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library