Consistent Quantitative Operational Risk Measurement and Regulation : Challenges of Model Specification, Data Collection and Loss Reporting /

Amid increased size and complexity of the banking industry, operational risk has a greater potential to transpire in more harmful ways than many other sources of risk. This paper provides a succinct overview of the current regulatory framework of operational risk under the New Basel Capital Accord w...

Volledige beschrijving

Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Jobst, Andreas
Formaat: Tijdschrift
Taal:English
Gepubliceerd in: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2007.
Reeks:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2007/254
Online toegang:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 01825cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF009631
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451868173 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Jobst, Andreas. 
245 1 0 |a Consistent Quantitative Operational Risk Measurement and Regulation :   |b Challenges of Model Specification, Data Collection and Loss Reporting /  |c Andreas Jobst. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2007. 
300 |a 1 online resource (46 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a Amid increased size and complexity of the banking industry, operational risk has a greater potential to transpire in more harmful ways than many other sources of risk. This paper provides a succinct overview of the current regulatory framework of operational risk under the New Basel Capital Accord with a view to inform a critical debate about the influence of varying loss profiles and different methods of data collection, loss reporting, and model specification on the reliability of operational risk estimates and the consistency of risk-sensitive capital rules. The presented findings offer guidance on enhanced market practice and more effective prudential standards for operational risk measurement. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2007/254 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2007/254/001.2007.issue-254-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library