|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01778cas a2200289 a 4500 |
| 001 |
AALejournalIMF009613 |
| 008 |
230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|c 5.00 USD
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9781451867985
|
| 022 |
|
|
|a 1018-5941
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a BD-DhAAL
|c BD-DhAAL
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Diewert, W. E.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Hedonic Imputation versus Time Dummy Hedonic Indexes /
|c W. E. Diewert, Mick Silver, Saeed Heravi.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c 2007.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (36 pages)
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
| 506 |
|
|
|a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a Statistical offices try to match item models when measuring inflation between two periods. However, for product areas with a high turnover of differentiated models, the use of hedonic indexes is more appropriate since they include unmatched new and old models. There are two main competing approaches to hedonic indexes are hedonic imputation (HI) indexes and dummy time hedonic (HD) indexes. This study provides a formal analysis of exactly why the results from the two approaches may differ and discusses the issue of choice between these approaches. An illustrative study for desktop PCs is provided.
|
| 538 |
|
|
|a Mode of access: Internet
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a WP
|2 imf
|
| 651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 imf
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Heravi, Saeed.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Silver, Mick.
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
|v No. 2007/234
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Full text available on IMF
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2007/234/001.2007.issue-234-en.xml
|z IMF e-Library
|