The Potential Role for Securitizing Public Sector Revenue Flows : An Application to the Philippines /

Since the mid-1980s, the securitization of future flow receivables has grown in importance as a financing alternative for the public sector. In a world of perfect capital markets, there appears to be little rationale-in terms of reducing the average cost of public sector financing-to resort to secur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Chalk, Nigel
Format: Zeitschrift
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2002.
Schriftenreihe:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2002/106
Online Zugang:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02053cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF008169
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451852905 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Chalk, Nigel. 
245 1 4 |a The Potential Role for Securitizing Public Sector Revenue Flows :   |b An Application to the Philippines /  |c Nigel Chalk. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2002. 
300 |a 1 online resource (30 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a Since the mid-1980s, the securitization of future flow receivables has grown in importance as a financing alternative for the public sector. In a world of perfect capital markets, there appears to be little rationale-in terms of reducing the average cost of public sector financing-to resort to secured borrowing. However, for many developing countries, financial markets are far from perfect. In particular, there may be an important role for secured financing where increased uncertainty or financial market volatility leads to credit rationing driven by information asymmetries. Secured financing, however, does not provide a free lunch. Such arrangements subordinate existing and future creditors and, as a result, may raise the cost of future borrowing. In addition, high transaction costs, the thin market in secured instruments, the risk of legal challenges, and reduced budget and debt management flexibility may offset the cost advantage of public sector securitization. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2002/106 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2002/106/001.2002.issue-106-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library