Trade and the Crisis : Protect or Recover /

The pace of trade reforms waned from the mid-2000s as protectionist sentiment began to increase. With the onset of the global financial crisis, reform progress not only halted but began to reverse. As we show in this note, new trade restrictions have had-in the limited products they targeted-a stron...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Saito, Mika
Altri autori: Gregory, Rob, Henn, Christian, McDonald, Brad
Natura: Periodico
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2010.
Serie:IMF Staff Position Notes; Staff Position Note ; No. 2010/007
Accesso online:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02451cas a2200277 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF007975
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781455251216 
022 |a 2617-6742 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Saito, Mika. 
245 1 0 |a Trade and the Crisis :   |b Protect or Recover /  |c Mika Saito, Christian Henn, Rob Gregory, Brad McDonald. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2010. 
300 |a 1 online resource (21 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Staff Position Notes 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a The pace of trade reforms waned from the mid-2000s as protectionist sentiment began to increase. With the onset of the global financial crisis, reform progress not only halted but began to reverse. As we show in this note, new trade restrictions have had-in the limited products they targeted-a strong negative impact on trade. The aggregate impact of new restrictions is modest, at about 0.25 percent of global trade, as most countries have resisted a widespread resort to protectionism. Looking ahead, however, in 2010 sustained high unemployment, uneven growth, and an unwinding of government stimulus measures suggest that protectionist pressures may rise. Gaps in World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments leave ample scope to further restrict trade, so unless all countries vigorously resist protectionism this could threaten the economic recovery and drag down future growth. Continuing and further enhancing the monitoring of all protectionist measures and maintaining the high-level political awareness of the associated macroeconomic risks will help. But the surest way to avoid such a downside scenario is to tighten multilateral trade commitments by completing the WTO Doha Round. This can be viewed as a key part of the exit strategy from the global economic crisis. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Gregory, Rob. 
700 1 |a Henn, Christian. 
700 1 |a McDonald, Brad. 
830 0 |a IMF Staff Position Notes; Staff Position Note ;  |v No. 2010/007 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/004/2010/007/004.2010.issue-007-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library