Bank Ownership and the Effects of Financial Liberalization : Evidence from India /

Do financial sector reforms necessarily result in expansion of credit to the private sector? How does bank ownership affect the availability of credit to the private sector? Empirical evidence is somewhat mixed on these issues. We use the Indian experience with liberalization of the financial sector...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Gupta, Poonam
Weitere Verfasser: Kochhar, Kalpana, Panth, Sanjaya
Format: Zeitschrift
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2011.
Schriftenreihe:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2011/050
Online Zugang:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02309cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF007076
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781455218929 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Gupta, Poonam. 
245 1 0 |a Bank Ownership and the Effects of Financial Liberalization :   |b Evidence from India /  |c Poonam Gupta, Kalpana Kochhar, Sanjaya Panth. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2011. 
300 |a 1 online resource (45 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a Do financial sector reforms necessarily result in expansion of credit to the private sector? How does bank ownership affect the availability of credit to the private sector? Empirical evidence is somewhat mixed on these issues. We use the Indian experience with liberalization of the financial sector to inform this debate. Using bank-level data from 1991-2007, we ask whether public and private banks deployed resources freed up by reduced state preemption to increase credit to the private sector. We find that even after liberalization, public banks allocated a larger share of their assets to government securities than did private banks. Crucially, we also find that public banks were more responsive in allocating relatively more resources to finance the fiscal deficit even during periods when state pre-emption (measured in terms of the requirement to hold government securities as a share of assets) formally declined. These findings suggest that in developing countries, where alternative channels of financing may be limited, government ownership of banks, combined with high fiscal deficits, may limit the gains from financial liberalization. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Kochhar, Kalpana. 
700 1 |a Panth, Sanjaya. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2011/050 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2011/050/001.2011.issue-050-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library