Boom-Bust Cycle, Asymmetrical Fiscal Response and the Dutch Disease /

We examine the behavior of expenditure policy during boom-bust in commodity price cycles, and its implication for real exchange rate movements. To do so, we introduce a Dutch disease model with downward rigidities in government spending to revenue shock. This model leads to a decoupling between real...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ismail, Kareem
Outros Autores: Arezki, Rabah
Formato: Periódico
Idioma:English
Publicado em: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2010.
Colecção:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2010/094
Acesso em linha:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02313cas a2200253 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF006405
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451982718 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Ismail, Kareem. 
245 1 0 |a Boom-Bust Cycle, Asymmetrical Fiscal Response and the Dutch Disease /  |c Kareem Ismail, Rabah Arezki. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2010. 
300 |a 1 online resource (33 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We examine the behavior of expenditure policy during boom-bust in commodity price cycles, and its implication for real exchange rate movements. To do so, we introduce a Dutch disease model with downward rigidities in government spending to revenue shock. This model leads to a decoupling between real exchange rate and commodity price movement during busts. We test our model's theoretical predictions and underlying assumptions using panel data for 32 oil-producing countries over the period 1992 to 2009. Results are threefold. First, we find that change in current spending have a stronger impact on the change in real exchange rate compared to capital spending. Second, we find that current spending is downwardly sticky, but increases in boom time, and conversely for capital spending. Third, we find limited evidence that fiscal rules have helped reduce the degree of responsiveness of current spending during booms. In contrast, we find evidence that fiscal rules are associated with a significant reduction in capital expenditure during busts while responsiveness to boosts is more muted. This raises concerns about potential adverse consequences of this asymmetry on economic performance in oil-producing countries. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Arezki, Rabah. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2010/094 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2010/094/001.2010.issue-094-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library