Uganda : Third Review Under the Policy Support Instrument and Request for Waiver and Modification of Assessment Criteria-Staff Report; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Uganda.

This paper discusses key findings of the Third Review Under the Policy Support Instrument for Uganda. All end-December 2007 assessment criteria were met. Macroeconomic performance remains strong and the growth outlook remains positive. IMF staff supports the authorities' request for waivers of...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
団体著者: International Monetary Fund
フォーマット: 雑誌
言語:English
出版事項: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2008.
シリーズ:IMF Staff Country Reports; Country Report ; No. 2008/236
オンライン・アクセス:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 01813cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF005252
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451838855 
022 |a 1934-7685 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
110 2 |a International Monetary Fund. 
245 1 0 |a Uganda :   |b Third Review Under the Policy Support Instrument and Request for Waiver and Modification of Assessment Criteria-Staff Report; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Uganda. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2008. 
300 |a 1 online resource (68 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Staff Country Reports 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a This paper discusses key findings of the Third Review Under the Policy Support Instrument for Uganda. All end-December 2007 assessment criteria were met. Macroeconomic performance remains strong and the growth outlook remains positive. IMF staff supports the authorities' request for waivers of nonobservance of four structural assessment criteria for end-May and end-June 2008. Nonobservance of these assessment criteria was largely owed to changes in program design in light of new information and reassessment of costs and priorities that do not compromise the integrity of the program. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a IMF Staff Country Reports; Country Report ;  |v No. 2008/236 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2008/236/002.2008.issue-236-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library