Comparative Advantage, Exchange Rates, and G-7 Sectoral Trade Balances /

This paper uses a Ricardian framework to clarify the role of microeconomic and macroeconomic factors governing the time series and cross-section behavior of sectoral trade balances. Unit labor costs and trade balances are calculated for several sectors for the seven major industrial countries. The t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Golub, Stephen
Format: Journal
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 1994.
Series:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 1994/005
Online Access:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 01807cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF004269
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451842111 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Golub, Stephen. 
245 1 0 |a Comparative Advantage, Exchange Rates, and G-7 Sectoral Trade Balances /  |c Stephen Golub. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 1994. 
300 |a 1 online resource (50 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a This paper uses a Ricardian framework to clarify the role of microeconomic and macroeconomic factors governing the time series and cross-section behavior of sectoral trade balances. Unit labor costs and trade balances are calculated for several sectors for the seven major industrial countries. The time series and cross-section variation in sectoral unit labor costs is decomposed into relative productivity, wage differentials, and exchange rate variations. The main findings are that changes over time in sectoral trade balances, especially for the United States and Japan, are quite well explained by the evolution of unit labor cost, suggesting that trade patterns conform to comparative advantage. The cross-section results are, however, less conclusive. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 1994/005 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1994/005/001.1994.issue-005-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library