|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01739cas a2200241 a 4500 |
001 |
AALejournalIMF003071 |
008 |
230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d |
020 |
|
|
|c 5.00 USD
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781451856156
|
022 |
|
|
|a 1018-5941
|
040 |
|
|
|a BD-DhAAL
|c BD-DhAAL
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Hauner, David.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Explaining Efficiency Differences Among Large German and Austrian Banks /
|c David Hauner.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c 2004.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (23 pages)
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
500 |
|
|
|a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
500 |
|
|
|a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
506 |
|
|
|a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Cost-efficiency, scale efficiency, and productivity change are estimated by data envelopment analysis; and cost-efficiency is regressed on explanatory variables. No evidence is found for average productivity responding to deregulation over the period studied. State-owned banks are found to be more cost-efficient (likely owing to cheaper funds) and cooperative banks to be about as cost-efficient as private banks. Increasing economies of scale but decreasing economies of scope provide rationale for M and As among banks with similar product portfolios. Interbank and capital market funding is found to be more cost-efficient than deposits when the cost of retail networks is controlled for.
|
538 |
|
|
|a Mode of access: Internet
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
|v No. 2004/140
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Full text available on IMF
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2004/140/001.2004.issue-140-en.xml
|z IMF e-Library
|