|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01871cas a2200253 a 4500 |
| 001 |
AALejournalIMF000716 |
| 008 |
230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|c 5.00 USD
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9781451855357
|
| 022 |
|
|
|a 1018-5941
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a BD-DhAAL
|c BD-DhAAL
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Zettelmeyer, Jeromin.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Output Decline and Recovery in Uzbekistan :
|b Past Performance and Future Prospects /
|c Jeromin Zettelmeyer, Gunther Taube.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c 1998.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (30 pages)
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
|
| 506 |
|
|
|a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a What explains Uzbekistan's unusually mild 'transformational recession' and its moderate recovery during 1996-97? We examine potential biases in output measurement, the role of 'special factors'-including initial production structure, natural resources, and public investment policies-and sectoral output developments. The main findings are (i) Uzbekistan's relatively favorable output record is not an artifact of measurement alone; (ii) public investment has had no significant effects on growth; (iii) the mildness of Uzbekistan's transitional recession can be accounted for by its favorable initial production structure and its self-sufficiency in energy; (iv) unless reforms are significantly accelerated, medium-term growth prospects are mediocre.
|
| 538 |
|
|
|a Mode of access: Internet
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Taube, Gunther.
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
|v No. 1998/132
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Full text available on IMF
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1998/132/001.1998.issue-132-en.xml
|z IMF e-Library
|