The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms

This article was published in the BRAC University Journal [© 2016 Published by BRAC University]

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Haque, Mohammad Mahmudul
Altri autori: Department of English and Humanities, BRAC University
Natura: Articolo
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: © 2016 Published by BRAC University 2016
Soggetti:
Accesso online:http://hdl.handle.net/10361/6777
id 10361-6777
record_format dspace
spelling 10361-67772019-09-30T03:23:31Z The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms Haque, Mohammad Mahmudul Department of English and Humanities, BRAC University FonF (focus on form), FonFS (focus on forms) Explicit use Communicative use This article was published in the BRAC University Journal [© 2016 Published by BRAC University] The literature review includes 13 articles and 2 chapters from 2 books titled Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching, and Learning, and Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching published in the last ten years focusing on the efficacy of Focus on form (FonF) or the communicative use of grammar in comparison with Focus on forms (FonFS) or the explicit use of grammar in language classrooms. The first section discusses researchers’ views on the employment of FonF vs. FonFS addressing issues like when FonF arises, points in favor of and against FonF in relation to FonFS, and different variables affecting the success of FonF. The second section discusses different views of learners regarding classroom use of FonF and FonFS with a separate subsection on the views held by the US and Colombian FL learners as they represent two contrasting preferences in terms of the adoption of FonF and FonFS. The third and final section deals with teachers’ views regarding the efficacy of FonF and FonFS followed by the difference in view among the US and Colombian FL teachers and how FonFS can be synthesized into FonF. The findings reveal that there is no universal efficacy of either FonF or FonFS; it is rather the context which decides on the efficacy of these two. Moreover, it is to be noted that a choice between FonF or FonFS is not mutually exclusive and one can be incorporated into the other. Published 2016-11-08T06:30:26Z 2016-11-08T06:30:26Z 2016 2016-10 Article Haque, M. M. (2016). The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms. BRAC University Journal, 11(1), 63–68. 1811-3079 http://hdl.handle.net/10361/6777 en 6 pages application/pdf © 2016 Published by BRAC University
institution Brac University
collection Institutional Repository
language English
topic FonF (focus on form),
FonFS (focus on forms)
Explicit use
Communicative use
spellingShingle FonF (focus on form),
FonFS (focus on forms)
Explicit use
Communicative use
Haque, Mohammad Mahmudul
The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
description This article was published in the BRAC University Journal [© 2016 Published by BRAC University]
author2 Department of English and Humanities, BRAC University
author_facet Department of English and Humanities, BRAC University
Haque, Mohammad Mahmudul
format Article
author Haque, Mohammad Mahmudul
author_sort Haque, Mohammad Mahmudul
title The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
title_short The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
title_full The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
title_fullStr The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
title_full_unstemmed The usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
title_sort usefulness of the debate between focus on form and focus on forms
publisher © 2016 Published by BRAC University
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10361/6777
work_keys_str_mv AT haquemohammadmahmudul theusefulnessofthedebatebetweenfocusonformandfocusonforms
AT haquemohammadmahmudul usefulnessofthedebatebetweenfocusonformandfocusonforms
_version_ 1814307106559361024