BRAC annual review, 1990
This report comments on performance to physical targets and performance to financial budgets during the first nine months of 1990. Inevitably, there are variations, but we did not identify any which we judge need be of major concern to donors. The general record is of greater rather than lesser ach...
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Annual review |
| Idioma: | English |
| Publicado: |
© BRAC
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Acceso en liña: | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/5900 |
| id |
10361-5900 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
10361-59002019-11-24T05:00:26Z BRAC annual review, 1990 BRAC Annual review Rural development This report comments on performance to physical targets and performance to financial budgets during the first nine months of 1990. Inevitably, there are variations, but we did not identify any which we judge need be of major concern to donors. The general record is of greater rather than lesser achievement in relation to what was planned. The report focuses on those areas where we believe improvements might be made. In many cases, our suggestions are largely endorsements of what we have discovered BRAC is already doing, or of changes that BRAC has already started to make. In certain areas, we have identified further improvements. In only a few instances do we recommend changes of substance or significance. 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 3. BRAC: the organisation 4. RDP II and RCP financial overview 5. Social and institutional development 6. Economic activities 7. Financial analysis 8. Management 9. Gender-related issues 10. Revised budget 11. Donor follow-up 2016-07-26T04:58:01Z 2016-07-26T04:58:01Z 1990-11 Annual review http://hdl.handle.net/10361/5900 en 187 pages application/pdf © BRAC |
| institution |
Brac University |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Annual review Rural development |
| spellingShingle |
Annual review Rural development BRAC BRAC annual review, 1990 |
| description |
This report comments on performance to physical targets and performance to financial budgets during the first nine months of 1990. Inevitably, there are variations, but we did not identify any which we judge need be of major concern to donors. The general record is of greater rather than lesser achievement in relation to what was planned.
The report focuses on those areas where we believe improvements might be made. In many cases, our suggestions are largely endorsements of what we have discovered BRAC is already doing, or of changes that BRAC has already started to make.
In certain areas, we have identified further improvements. In only a few instances do we recommend changes of substance or significance. |
| format |
Annual review |
| author |
BRAC |
| author_facet |
BRAC |
| author_sort |
BRAC |
| title |
BRAC annual review, 1990 |
| title_short |
BRAC annual review, 1990 |
| title_full |
BRAC annual review, 1990 |
| title_fullStr |
BRAC annual review, 1990 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
BRAC annual review, 1990 |
| title_sort |
brac annual review, 1990 |
| publisher |
© BRAC |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10361/5900 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT brac bracannualreview1990 |
| _version_ |
1814309403079213056 |