Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions

Cataloged from PDF version of report.

Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Elahi, Khandakar Qudrat-I
Другие авторы: Department of Economics and Social Sciences, BRAC University
Формат: Working paper series
Язык:English
Опубликовано: BRAC University 2010
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:http://hdl.handle.net/10361/346
id 10361-346
record_format dspace
spelling 10361-3462019-09-30T04:27:20Z Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions ESS working paper series August-2005 : Paper-04 Elahi, Khandakar Qudrat-I Department of Economics and Social Sciences, BRAC University Economic inequality Income distribution Pareto principle Cataloged from PDF version of report. Includes bibliographical references (page 14-15). This paper examines the academic soundness of the Pareto welfare criterion as a normative rule for evaluating alternative economic inequality scenarios and suggests that the criterion has several weaknesses, which wear off its usefulness: First, the Pareto principle is of limited use in the inequality debate, because labour markets hardly satisfy the conditions of perfect competition, the pivotal assumption of the theory. Second, the proposition, competitive equilibrium leads to' common good' of society, is difficult to defend. Third, the Paretian welfare economics barely answers the questions society demands, because perfect competition does not guarantee fairness in the determination of relative prices in the initial situation of income distribution. Fourth, the marginal productivity principle does not determine how, profits, the huge surpluses generated by the businesses, are distributed. Fifth, income distribution is a political issue, but Pareto's primary motivation was to alienate the distribution debate from policy and political discourses. Finally, the public earning structure is much more equitable than that of the private sector. This brings out a very serious question: which earning structure reflects improvement in social welfare: public or private? Khandakar Qudrat-I Elahi 2010-10-06T03:40:13Z 2010-10-06T03:40:13Z 2005 2005-08 Working paper series http://hdl.handle.net/10361/346 en BRAC University reports are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. 18 pages application/pdf BRAC University
institution Brac University
collection Institutional Repository
language English
topic Economic inequality
Income distribution
Pareto principle
spellingShingle Economic inequality
Income distribution
Pareto principle
Elahi, Khandakar Qudrat-I
Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
description Cataloged from PDF version of report.
author2 Department of Economics and Social Sciences, BRAC University
author_facet Department of Economics and Social Sciences, BRAC University
Elahi, Khandakar Qudrat-I
format Working paper series
author Elahi, Khandakar Qudrat-I
author_sort Elahi, Khandakar Qudrat-I
title Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
title_short Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
title_full Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
title_fullStr Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
title_full_unstemmed Economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
title_sort economic inequality and paretian welfare enonomics: some insinuating questions
publisher BRAC University
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10361/346
work_keys_str_mv AT elahikhandakarqudrati economicinequalityandparetianwelfareenonomicssomeinsinuatingquestions
AT elahikhandakarqudrati essworkingpaperseriesaugust2005paper04
_version_ 1814309742850342912