Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design

This paper describes the research design for investigating and evaluating the Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) social protection cash-plus intervention in a slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh. After an introductory section, the second section elaborates on c...

Disgrifiad llawn

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Prif Awduron:	Ton, Giel, Roelen, Keetie, Howard, Neil, Huq, Lopita
Fformat:	Working Paper
Iaith:	English
Cyhoeddwyd:	Institute of Development Studies 2024
Pynciau:	Social protection Research design Cash-plus intervention CLARISA
Mynediad Ar-lein:	http://hdl.handle.net/10361/23764

id	10361-23764
record_format	dspace
spelling	10361-237642024-08-14T05:06:10Z Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design Ton, Giel Roelen, Keetie Howard, Neil Huq, Lopita Social protection Research design Cash-plus intervention CLARISA This paper describes the research design for investigating and evaluating the Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) social protection cash-plus intervention in a slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh. After an introductory section, the second section elaborates on contribution analysis – the methodological approach underpinning the research design. The third section provides an overview of the intervention, and the fourth explores the overall design of the evaluation, its guiding framework, and the timeline of the intervention rollout and data collection. The fifth and sixth sections address the project’s suite of quantitative and qualitative methods and the approach to data analysis. Using four-panel surveys, bi-monthly monitoring, in-depth interviews, group discussions and direct observations, the research will zoom in on specific behaviours. First, at the individual level, the authors want to learn how people adopt alternative livelihoods in response to the intervention. Second, at the household level, they consider how community mobilisation and cash transfers help households to resolve intra‑household problems. Third, at the group level, they consider how groups manage collective action in response to community mobilisation. For each of these behaviour change outcomes, they want to understand the realist evaluation question, ‘Why does the intervention work, for whom, and under what conditions?’ they also want to assess whether these new behaviours change the propensity for children to be involved in the worst forms of child labour. 2024-08-14T05:05:08Z 2024-08-14T05:05:08Z 2022-09 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/10361/23764 en Institute of Development Studies
institution	Brac University
collection	Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	Social protection Research design Cash-plus intervention CLARISA
spellingShingle	Social protection Research design Cash-plus intervention CLARISA Ton, Giel Roelen, Keetie Howard, Neil Huq, Lopita Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design
description	This paper describes the research design for investigating and evaluating the Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) social protection cash-plus intervention in a slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh. After an introductory section, the second section elaborates on contribution analysis – the methodological approach underpinning the research design. The third section provides an overview of the intervention, and the fourth explores the overall design of the evaluation, its guiding framework, and the timeline of the intervention rollout and data collection. The fifth and sixth sections address the project’s suite of quantitative and qualitative methods and the approach to data analysis. Using four-panel surveys, bi-monthly monitoring, in-depth interviews, group discussions and direct observations, the research will zoom in on specific behaviours. First, at the individual level, the authors want to learn how people adopt alternative livelihoods in response to the intervention. Second, at the household level, they consider how community mobilisation and cash transfers help households to resolve intra‑household problems. Third, at the group level, they consider how groups manage collective action in response to community mobilisation. For each of these behaviour change outcomes, they want to understand the realist evaluation question, ‘Why does the intervention work, for whom, and under what conditions?’ they also want to assess whether these new behaviours change the propensity for children to be involved in the worst forms of child labour.
format	Working Paper
author	Ton, Giel Roelen, Keetie Howard, Neil Huq, Lopita
author_facet	Ton, Giel Roelen, Keetie Howard, Neil Huq, Lopita
author_sort	Ton, Giel
title	Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design
title_short	Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design
title_full	Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design
title_fullStr	Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design
title_full_unstemmed	Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design
title_sort	social protection intervention: evaluation research design
publisher	Institute of Development Studies
publishDate	2024
url	http://hdl.handle.net/10361/23764
work_keys_str_mv	AT tongiel socialprotectioninterventionevaluationresearchdesign AT roelenkeetie socialprotectioninterventionevaluationresearchdesign AT howardneil socialprotectioninterventionevaluationresearchdesign AT huqlopita socialprotectioninterventionevaluationresearchdesign
_version_	1814307225051594752

Social protection intervention: Evaluation research design

Eitemau Tebyg