From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
This article was published in the Qualitative Inquiry [© The Author(s) 2018) ] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Journal's website is at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
其他作者: | |
格式: | Journal Article |
语言: | en_US |
出版: |
SAGE Journals
2022
|
主题: | |
在线阅读: | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16446 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 |
id |
10361-16446 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
10361-164462022-03-22T05:14:55Z From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid Bärnighausen, Till Kennedy, Caitlin Brinkmann, Svend Sarker, Malabika Wikler, Daniel Eyal, Nir McMahon, Shannon A. Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health Qualitative interviews Interview styles Doxastic Epistemic Deliberation This article was published in the Qualitative Inquiry [© The Author(s) 2018) ] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Journal's website is at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724 Qualitative interview styles have been guided by precedent within academic disciplines. The nature of information sought, and the role of interviewer and interviewee are key determinants across styles, which range from doxastic (focused on understanding interviewees’ experiences or behaviors) to epistemic (focused on co-constructing knowledge). In this article, we position common interview styles along a doxastic–epistemic continuum, and according to the role of the interviewee (from respondent to equal partner). Through our typology and critique of interview styles, we enhance epistemic interviewing by introducing “deliberative interviews,” which are more debate oriented and closer to equality in the interviewee and interviewer relationship than existing interview styles. Deliberative interviews require a comprehensive, pre-interview briefing on the subject matter followed by interactive deliberation wherein complex issues are debated across viewpoints in an effort to devise solutions. The effectiveness of this interview style in generating new knowledge warrants empirical testing across academic disciplines. Published 2022-03-13T05:50:48Z 2022-03-13T05:50:48Z 2018 2018-11 Journal Article Berner-Rodoreda, A., Bärnighausen, T., Kennedy, C., Brinkmann, S., Sarker, M., Wikler, D., . . . McMahon, S. A. (2020). From doxastic to epistemic: A typology and critique of qualitative interview styles. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 291-305. doi:10.1177/1077800418810724 http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16446 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 en_US https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Qualitative Inquiry application/pdf SAGE Journals |
institution |
Brac University |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
language |
en_US |
topic |
Qualitative interviews Interview styles Doxastic Epistemic Deliberation |
spellingShingle |
Qualitative interviews Interview styles Doxastic Epistemic Deliberation Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid Bärnighausen, Till Kennedy, Caitlin Brinkmann, Svend Sarker, Malabika Wikler, Daniel Eyal, Nir McMahon, Shannon A. From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles |
description |
This article was published in the Qualitative Inquiry [© The Author(s) 2018) ] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Journal's website is at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724 |
author2 |
Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health |
author_facet |
Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid Bärnighausen, Till Kennedy, Caitlin Brinkmann, Svend Sarker, Malabika Wikler, Daniel Eyal, Nir McMahon, Shannon A. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid Bärnighausen, Till Kennedy, Caitlin Brinkmann, Svend Sarker, Malabika Wikler, Daniel Eyal, Nir McMahon, Shannon A. |
author_sort |
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid |
title |
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles |
title_short |
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles |
title_full |
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles |
title_fullStr |
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles |
title_full_unstemmed |
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles |
title_sort |
from doxastic to epistemic: a typology and critique of qualitative interview styles |
publisher |
SAGE Journals |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16446 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bernerrodoredaastrid fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT barnighausentill fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT kennedycaitlin fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT brinkmannsvend fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT sarkermalabika fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT wiklerdaniel fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT eyalnir fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles AT mcmahonshannona fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles |
_version_ |
1814309431506108416 |