From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles

This article was published in the Qualitative Inquiry [© The Author(s) 2018) ] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Journal's website is at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid, Bärnighausen, Till, Kennedy, Caitlin, Brinkmann, Svend, Sarker, Malabika, Wikler, Daniel, Eyal, Nir, McMahon, Shannon A.
其他作者: Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health
格式: Journal Article
语言:en_US
出版: SAGE Journals 2022
主题:
在线阅读:http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16446
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724
id 10361-16446
record_format dspace
spelling 10361-164462022-03-22T05:14:55Z From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid Bärnighausen, Till Kennedy, Caitlin Brinkmann, Svend Sarker, Malabika Wikler, Daniel Eyal, Nir McMahon, Shannon A. Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health Qualitative interviews Interview styles Doxastic Epistemic Deliberation This article was published in the Qualitative Inquiry [© The Author(s) 2018) ] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Journal's website is at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724 Qualitative interview styles have been guided by precedent within academic disciplines. The nature of information sought, and the role of interviewer and interviewee are key determinants across styles, which range from doxastic (focused on understanding interviewees’ experiences or behaviors) to epistemic (focused on co-constructing knowledge). In this article, we position common interview styles along a doxastic–epistemic continuum, and according to the role of the interviewee (from respondent to equal partner). Through our typology and critique of interview styles, we enhance epistemic interviewing by introducing “deliberative interviews,” which are more debate oriented and closer to equality in the interviewee and interviewer relationship than existing interview styles. Deliberative interviews require a comprehensive, pre-interview briefing on the subject matter followed by interactive deliberation wherein complex issues are debated across viewpoints in an effort to devise solutions. The effectiveness of this interview style in generating new knowledge warrants empirical testing across academic disciplines. Published 2022-03-13T05:50:48Z 2022-03-13T05:50:48Z 2018 2018-11 Journal Article Berner-Rodoreda, A., Bärnighausen, T., Kennedy, C., Brinkmann, S., Sarker, M., Wikler, D., . . . McMahon, S. A. (2020). From doxastic to epistemic: A typology and critique of qualitative interview styles. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 291-305. doi:10.1177/1077800418810724 http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16446 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 en_US https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Qualitative Inquiry application/pdf SAGE Journals
institution Brac University
collection Institutional Repository
language en_US
topic Qualitative interviews
Interview styles
Doxastic
Epistemic
Deliberation
spellingShingle Qualitative interviews
Interview styles
Doxastic
Epistemic
Deliberation
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
Bärnighausen, Till
Kennedy, Caitlin
Brinkmann, Svend
Sarker, Malabika
Wikler, Daniel
Eyal, Nir
McMahon, Shannon A.
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
description This article was published in the Qualitative Inquiry [© The Author(s) 2018) ] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724 The Journal's website is at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800418810724
author2 Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health
author_facet Brac James P. Grant School of Public Health
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
Bärnighausen, Till
Kennedy, Caitlin
Brinkmann, Svend
Sarker, Malabika
Wikler, Daniel
Eyal, Nir
McMahon, Shannon A.
format Journal Article
author Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
Bärnighausen, Till
Kennedy, Caitlin
Brinkmann, Svend
Sarker, Malabika
Wikler, Daniel
Eyal, Nir
McMahon, Shannon A.
author_sort Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
title From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
title_short From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
title_full From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
title_fullStr From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
title_full_unstemmed From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles
title_sort from doxastic to epistemic: a typology and critique of qualitative interview styles
publisher SAGE Journals
publishDate 2022
url http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16446
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810724
work_keys_str_mv AT bernerrodoredaastrid fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT barnighausentill fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT kennedycaitlin fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT brinkmannsvend fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT sarkermalabika fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT wiklerdaniel fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT eyalnir fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
AT mcmahonshannona fromdoxastictoepistemicatypologyandcritiqueofqualitativeinterviewstyles
_version_ 1814309431506108416