Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting?
This book chapter was published in the book named Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection and the definite version is available at : https://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/132858/filename/133064.pdf
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Book chapter |
| Lenguaje: | en_US |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16236 |
| id |
10361-16236 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
10361-162362022-02-13T09:11:25Z Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? Sulaiman, Munshi Africa Social protection Graduation approach Livelihood This book chapter was published in the book named Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection and the definite version is available at : https://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/132858/filename/133064.pdf Social protection initiatives in Africa increasingly aim to institutionalize systems that guarantee assistance for the poor and protect the vulnerable against livelihood risks. Through direct and indirect income effects, social protection programs can also play an instrumental role in promoting agricultural development and, more broadly, economic growth. The 2017-2018 Annual Trends and Outlook Report (ATOR) takes an in-depth look at social protection in rural Africa to address these three questions, which are particularly relevant as Africa embarks on the implementation of the Malabo Declaration commitments and the African Union’s Agenda 2063. First, the contributed chapters summarize and synthesize the available evidence on successful implementation of social protection programs in rural Africa. Second, the report fills in knowledge gaps on how to maximize the role of social protection in reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience of rural households. Third, the report highlights policy implications to guide the design and roll-out of national social protection programs for rural Africa. Chapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts across the three types of approaches. 2022-02-13T08:59:47Z 2022-02-13T08:59:47Z 2018-10 Book chapter Sulaiman, Munshi. 2018. Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? In Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection, eds. Fleur Stephanie Wouterse and Alemayehu Seyoum Taffesse. Chapter 8, Pp. 102-120. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896295988_08 http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16236 en_US https://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/132858/filename/133064.pdf International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) |
| institution |
Brac University |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| language |
en_US |
| topic |
Africa Social protection Graduation approach Livelihood |
| spellingShingle |
Africa Social protection Graduation approach Livelihood Sulaiman, Munshi Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| description |
This book chapter was published in the book named Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection and the definite version is available at : https://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/132858/filename/133064.pdf |
| format |
Book chapter |
| author |
Sulaiman, Munshi |
| author_facet |
Sulaiman, Munshi |
| author_sort |
Sulaiman, Munshi |
| title |
Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_short |
Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_full |
Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_fullStr |
Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Livelihood, cash Transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_sort |
livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: how do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| publisher |
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16236 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sulaimanmunshi livelihoodcashtransferandgraduationapproacheshowdotheycompareintermsofcostimpactandtargeting |
| _version_ |
1814309365970108416 |