An early assessment of CFPR II support packages

Based on the programmatic lessons and research knowledge accumulated from CFPR phase I, CFPR phase II was designed to expand its outreach while incorporating greater diversity in support packages. The support packages of CFPR phase II are primarily divided into two groups: Specially Targeted Ultra P...

Ամբողջական նկարագրություն

Մատենագիտական մանրամասներ
Հիմնական հեղինակներ: Das, Narayan Chandra, Raza, Wameq Azfar, Misha, Farzana Akter
Ձևաչափ: Working Paper
Լեզու:en_US
Հրապարակվել է: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division 2022
Խորագրեր:
Առցանց հասանելիություն:http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16190
id 10361-16190
record_format dspace
spelling 10361-161902022-02-08T21:02:07Z An early assessment of CFPR II support packages Das, Narayan Chandra Raza, Wameq Azfar Misha, Farzana Akter Food expenditure Income Livestock Ultra-poor Based on the programmatic lessons and research knowledge accumulated from CFPR phase I, CFPR phase II was designed to expand its outreach while incorporating greater diversity in support packages. The support packages of CFPR phase II are primarily divided into two groups: Specially Targeted Ultra Poor (STUP) and Other Targeted Ultra Poor (OTUP). STUP and OTUP packages were further disaggregated into STUP 1 and 2 and OTUP 1 and 2. This paper presents an early assessment of the performance of the CFPR phase II support packages. For STUP 1 assessment, a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) method was used. For STUP 2 and OTUP 1 and 2 packages, the assessment was conducted by comparing old and new cohorts. STUP 1 package was found to have significant positive impacts on the livelihoods of the participating households. Evidence shows that as a result of program participation, the STUP 1 households experienced an increase in farm self-employment for both males and females, diversification of income sources, increase in per capita income and food expenditure, and increase in saving behaviour. STUP 2 and OTUP 1 and 2 packages, assessed using the same method, were also found to have positive impacts on livelihoods of the participating households although the dimensions and magnitude of impacts varied within the packages. Effectiveness of OTUP 2 package was found to be the lowest amongst these three packages. This is, however, expected as OTUP 2 package is significantly less intensive than the STUP 2 and OTUP 1. On the other hand, the efficacy of the STUP 2 and OTUP 1 packages was found to be quite similar despite the STUP 2 package being more intensive of the two. The STUP 2 households, as was found in this study, experienced loss of livestock and poultry due to hurricane Sidr, which might have slowed down the effectiveness of this package. 2022-02-08T06:31:03Z 2022-02-08T06:31:03Z 2009-12 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16190 en_US application/pdf BRAC Research and Evaluation Division
institution Brac University
collection Institutional Repository
language en_US
topic Food expenditure
Income
Livestock
Ultra-poor
spellingShingle Food expenditure
Income
Livestock
Ultra-poor
Das, Narayan Chandra
Raza, Wameq Azfar
Misha, Farzana Akter
An early assessment of CFPR II support packages
description Based on the programmatic lessons and research knowledge accumulated from CFPR phase I, CFPR phase II was designed to expand its outreach while incorporating greater diversity in support packages. The support packages of CFPR phase II are primarily divided into two groups: Specially Targeted Ultra Poor (STUP) and Other Targeted Ultra Poor (OTUP). STUP and OTUP packages were further disaggregated into STUP 1 and 2 and OTUP 1 and 2. This paper presents an early assessment of the performance of the CFPR phase II support packages. For STUP 1 assessment, a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) method was used. For STUP 2 and OTUP 1 and 2 packages, the assessment was conducted by comparing old and new cohorts. STUP 1 package was found to have significant positive impacts on the livelihoods of the participating households. Evidence shows that as a result of program participation, the STUP 1 households experienced an increase in farm self-employment for both males and females, diversification of income sources, increase in per capita income and food expenditure, and increase in saving behaviour. STUP 2 and OTUP 1 and 2 packages, assessed using the same method, were also found to have positive impacts on livelihoods of the participating households although the dimensions and magnitude of impacts varied within the packages. Effectiveness of OTUP 2 package was found to be the lowest amongst these three packages. This is, however, expected as OTUP 2 package is significantly less intensive than the STUP 2 and OTUP 1. On the other hand, the efficacy of the STUP 2 and OTUP 1 packages was found to be quite similar despite the STUP 2 package being more intensive of the two. The STUP 2 households, as was found in this study, experienced loss of livestock and poultry due to hurricane Sidr, which might have slowed down the effectiveness of this package.
format Working Paper
author Das, Narayan Chandra
Raza, Wameq Azfar
Misha, Farzana Akter
author_facet Das, Narayan Chandra
Raza, Wameq Azfar
Misha, Farzana Akter
author_sort Das, Narayan Chandra
title An early assessment of CFPR II support packages
title_short An early assessment of CFPR II support packages
title_full An early assessment of CFPR II support packages
title_fullStr An early assessment of CFPR II support packages
title_full_unstemmed An early assessment of CFPR II support packages
title_sort early assessment of cfpr ii support packages
publisher BRAC Research and Evaluation Division
publishDate 2022
url http://hdl.handle.net/10361/16190
work_keys_str_mv AT dasnarayanchandra anearlyassessmentofcfpriisupportpackages
AT razawameqazfar anearlyassessmentofcfpriisupportpackages
AT mishafarzanaakter anearlyassessmentofcfpriisupportpackages
AT dasnarayanchandra earlyassessmentofcfpriisupportpackages
AT razawameqazfar earlyassessmentofcfpriisupportpackages
AT mishafarzanaakter earlyassessmentofcfpriisupportpackages
_version_ 1814309571747905536