The Russian Flat Tax Reform /

Russia dramatically reduced its higher rates of personal income tax (PIT) in 2001 establishing a single marginal rate at the low level of 13 percent. In the following year, real revenue from the PIT actually increased by about 26 percent. This 'flat tax' experience has attracted much atten...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yazar: Keen, Michael
Diğer Yazarlar: Ivanova, Anna, Klemm, Alexander
Materyal Türü: Dergi
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2005.
Seri Bilgileri:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2005/016
Online Erişim:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02087cas a2200265 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF008735
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451860351 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Keen, Michael. 
245 1 4 |a The Russian Flat Tax Reform /  |c Michael Keen, Alexander Klemm, Anna Ivanova. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2005. 
300 |a 1 online resource (47 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a Russia dramatically reduced its higher rates of personal income tax (PIT) in 2001 establishing a single marginal rate at the low level of 13 percent. In the following year, real revenue from the PIT actually increased by about 26 percent. This 'flat tax' experience has attracted much attention (and emulation) among policymakers, making it perhaps the most important tax reform of recent years. But it has been little studied. This paper asks whether the strong revenue performance of the PIT was itself a consequence of this reform, using both macro evidence and, in particular, micro-level data on the experiences of individuals and households affected by the reform to varying degrees. It concludes that there is no evidence of a strong supply side effect of the reform. Compliance, however, did improve quite substantially-by about one third according to our estimates-though it remains unclear whether this was due to the parametric reforms or to accompanying changes in enforcement. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Ivanova, Anna. 
700 1 |a Klemm, Alexander. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2005/016 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2005/016/001.2005.issue-016-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library