Republic of Croatia : Second Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Waiver of Performance Criteria and for Modification of a Performance Criterion.

This paper assesses the Republic of Croatia's Second Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Waiver of Performance Criteria and for Modification of a Performance Criterion. Although there were continuing delays in structural reforms, the main performance criteria for end-2001 we...

Volledige beschrijving

Bibliografische gegevens
Coauteur: International Monetary Fund
Formaat: Tijdschrift
Taal:English
Gepubliceerd in: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2002.
Reeks:IMF Staff Country Reports; Country Report ; No. 2002/076
Online toegang:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 01750cas a2200241 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF001945
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451817270 
022 |a 1934-7685 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
110 2 |a International Monetary Fund. 
245 1 0 |a Republic of Croatia :   |b Second Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Waiver of Performance Criteria and for Modification of a Performance Criterion. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2002. 
300 |a 1 online resource (58 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Staff Country Reports 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a This paper assesses the Republic of Croatia's Second Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Waiver of Performance Criteria and for Modification of a Performance Criterion. Although there were continuing delays in structural reforms, the main performance criteria for end-2001 were observed. The IMF staff supports waivers for the nonobservance of these performance criteria on the grounds that the nonobservance is likely to be largely temporary in the light of an unchanged privatization program, and that there is no evidence that it caused a crowding out of the private sector. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
830 0 |a IMF Staff Country Reports; Country Report ;  |v No. 2002/076 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2002/076/002.2002.issue-076-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library